$layernum = 100; ?>
Democracy depends on groups of people coming to terms with one another, and devising solutions that will address the needs of most, if not all, of its citizens. Even a system like mine, in the United States, where majority rules, cannot afford to completely ignore the needs of anyone not in the winning party. Democracies simply cannot function unless citizens and policy-makers can talk to one another and achieve some sort of common ground in addressing the issues of the day. However, when people can choose their news and information from an unlimited variety of sources, they usually will choose sources that confirm their pre-existing biases. According to theFolklorist.com, confirmation bias is “a tendency on the part of human beings to seek support or confirmation for their beliefs.” It makes sense, if you think about it. The only basis we have in evaluating any source of information is the set of information—including opinions—that we have already decided is true. Very few people will be inclined to choose primary sources of information that consistently put forth ideas that just seem wrong. - Rebecca Blood
Jerry Weinberg has a nice phrase for something like confirmation bias: "Our findings depend on our lookings."
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
Rebecca Blood channeling Cass Sunstein
This page which contains an entry consisting of 191 words and 1 paragraph was generated in 154.19 seconds.